Featured Blog Making Movies by Giacomo Sardelli

This months featured WordPress Blog is Making Movies, the blog of Giacomo Sardelli, the person behind the viral video Further Up Yonder, which has been on local and global news. For those who have not yet seen the video, it explores the idea of different nations and cultures all living together on the International Space Station (ISS), exploring the edge of our world.

Making Movies uses the Twenty Eleven Child theme, a child theme based on the 2011 theme for WordPress, and caters for both English and Italian readers so may not be to everyone’s taste both style wise and for content. However, it does show the incredible versatility of WordPress.

Among the plugins in use are Jetpack, SEO Facebook Comments and Twenty Eleven Theme Extensions. You can find out more about the details via the following links:

This site is well worth a visit if you are interested in movie making or editing and the viral video is a must see, as it is a classic stop frame compilation using images from the Science and Analysis Laboratory from NASA. We recommend a visit to Making Movies, so follow the link below and watch the video, then check out Giacomo Sardelli’s blog.

Information Technology is Part of Your Core Business

While reading an article preview on Why Your IT Project May Be Riskier Than You Think, we came across a comment by James Watson which deserves a wider airing. Actually warranting a post on its own, this response is about projects which are labeled as black swans, and is a reason why companies looking to engage in IT enabled transformation should take a deep breath.

If your company leadership is considering a strategic change of direction, planning on ditching your in-house custom software without taking the advice of the internal IT professionals, or without competent IT stakeholders at the highest levels of the organization, then you should point out this post to them without delay. Remember, Information Technology is part of your core business.

The issue is that in most non-software companies, information technology is treated like something separate from the business. The conventional wisdom of a decade ago dominates. That is, if your company is not producing software for sale, it shouldn’t be building software. It should be purchased, like Word or Excel.

This line of reasoning seems pretty bullet-proof until you dig into the details and it leads to a number of problems including the issues in the article. First, lets be clear, no company should seek to build software for internal use that can be purchased at reasonable cost and can can meet their needs without customization.

Secondly, companies should seek to purchase or otherwise acquire software that implements the generic functions and allows for powerful customizations. The issue arises when companies purchase something like SAP assuming that their needs are sufficiently supported by the software and that anything they need that is special will be supported by ‘configuration’.

What then happens is that the company realizes (after investing large amounts of money) that they can either make their business completely generic and lose all strategic advantage over competitors or they can pile on a lot more money to customize the hell out of it. Given the options, most high-level execs prefer more investment over losing strategic advantage. Some companies (I suppose) choose the other option and a lot of IT people think this is a good idea (it isn’t.)

You might be more likely to succeed at the project but the company will often be ruined in the process. In the ‘success’ example, I wonder how much of the companies strategic differentiation was sacrificed in order to avoid increasing scope. Alternately, the ‘success’ could be a shelfware system that is unusable because it doesn’t meet business needs. I have seen many ‘successful’ projects that produce no positive business value.

The true error is taking on a project based on false assumptions and magical thinking. Once that mistake is made, there are no good options. Companies need to stop thinking that information technology is separate from their core functions. Most information technology is only worth having if it is tightly coupled to the design of the business and often technology imposes fundamental constraints on business.

No project management methodologies or helpful tips will address this problem. Companies need to embrace technology and make IT a stakeholder at the highest levels of the organization for the kinds of problems described in the article to be fully addressed.

This comment by James Watson was cribbed wholesale from Why Your IT Project May Be Riskier Than You Think by Bent Flyvbjerg and Alexander Budzier. Check out the full article and then quote James Watson to your company leadership!

Maximum Size of a FAT-32 Partition

Have you ever wondered what the maximum size of a FAT-32 partition could be?

Do you have an external drive which needs to be accessed on different operating systems such as Windows and Mac OSX? Have you moved from Windows to Mac or Linux and find that you can no longer access the Windows (NTFS) drive you used for your media files? How about plugging your media library into the DVD or other player, but find that it can not read NTFS or one of the Linux formats? That means that you probably need to format your disk using FAT32.

FAT32 provides the maximum level of compatibility between OS X and Windows machines. OS X has the capability of reading and writing to FAT32 drives built into the OS, and naturally Windows can see these drives too. But what is the Maximum Size of a FAT-32 Partition?

According to Microsoft, when you use the FAT32 file system with Windows XP:

  • Clusters cannot be 64 kilobytes (KB) or larger. If clusters are 64 KB or larger, some programs (such as Setup programs) may incorrectly calculate disk space.
  • A FAT32 volume must contain a minimum of 65,527 clusters. You cannot increase the cluster size on a volume that uses the FAT32 file system so that it contains fewer than 65,527 clusters.
  • The maximum disk size is approximately 8 terabytes when you take into account the following variables: The maximum possible number of clusters on a FAT32 volume is 268,435,445, and there is a maximum of 32 KB per cluster, along with the space required for the file allocation table (FAT).
  • You cannot decrease the cluster size on a FAT32 volume so that the size of the FAT is larger than 16 megabytes (MB) minus 64 KB.
  • You cannot format a volume larger than 32 gigabytes (GB) in size using the FAT32 file system during the Windows XP installation process. Windows XP can mount and support FAT32 volumes larger than 32 GB (subject to the other limits), but you cannot create a FAT32 volume larger than 32 GB by using the Format tool during Setup.
  • You cannot create a file larger than (2^32)-1 bytes (this is one byte less than 4 GB) on a FAT32 partition.

Remember, the maximum file size on a FAT32 drive is 4GB. So if you have a file that’s larger than 4GB, you can not use FAT32. It is not uncommon for raw HD video files to be much larger than 4GB, particularly when recording live events. If you are planning to access such video files on both Windows and Mac OSX machines, do not have access to network connectivity and want to avoid third party add-ons, then download the files onto a Windows NTFS drive which a Mac will subsequently be able to access (read-only).

So according to Microsoft’s calculations above, the Maximum Size of a FAT-32 Partition is approximately 8 terabytes.

For additional information about the FAT32 file system, see the links below: